How dBs are used in this instance.
When most people who have studied a little science hear talk of the Decibell they think of sound level meters that measure the
local factory noise and tell you if it’s dangerous or not. So for instance the
basic definition is as follows.
![]()
where
is agreed upon as the
sound pressure level at 1kHz of the
threshold of hearing, P is the sound pressure you are measuring and
is the dB reading.
Have a look here
http://physics.mtsu.edu/~wmr/log_3.htm
Now, the trouble is that Electrical Engineers use dBs
a little differently. Because of this a few people (including the Times of
London) have miss-interpreted my Spectral Density graph. Electrical Engineers
use dBs as follows. Either
![]()
or
The latter expression is normally used to measure the gain of an
amplifier at different frequencies – we measure the output and input voltages
at increasing values of frequency and plot the frequency response (Gain
in dB versus frequency in Hz or radians/s).
In communication engineering (another branch of Electrical Engineering)
we measure dB as the first of the above equations with dBPower.
Signal to noise ratio is also measured in a similar way
![]()
So what about Power-Spectral
density? Well, the dB used is just
. It has no absolute meaning (ie
the sound of a noisy restaurant!). Instead we use it to measure how harmonics
differ – ie a comparison. For example third harmonic
distortion might be 60dB down (ie lower in dB) on the
fundamental – this would be a good thing for an audio signal – the ear could
not pick this up. If I multiply the signal strength by 2 then the overall dBs increase but the relative
dB differences stay the same. So please don’t confuse the Power Spectrum with
the audio sound pressure spectrum – the latter is measured relative to an
international agreed standard of sound pressure and the former is just a
relative measure within the graph itself. I hope this clears things up.